Culturally
responsive pedagogy is defined by Gay (2001, p.106) as “using the cultural
characteristics, experiences and perspectives as conduits for effective
teaching.” It is reflected in five elements including knowledge about cultural
diversity, the culturally integrated content in the curriculum, the development
of the learning community, the ability to communicate with culturally diverse
students and culturally responsive delivery of instruction (Gay, 2001).
Step 1 (What): What is your
understanding of indigenous knowledge and cultural responsiveness and what are
the two of the areas mentioned above that you want to focus on for discussion?
My understanding of Indigenous knowledge did not develop
until I was in tertiary education and was finally educated about the true
history of New Zealand and the impact of colonization on what was previously a
thriving and highly educated indigenous population of Maori, the Tangata
Whenua.
Until then I was fairly ignorant as I was raised in a pakeha family
with little to no interaction with Maori, despite the fact I had married a
Maori man and had Maori children. He was completely disengaged from his culture.
I had no cultural exposure beyond the tokenistic numbers and colours in Te Reo
that was part of the New Zealand educational system in the mid 1970s to 1980s.
As an educator, I recognize that I am an agentic style teacher, believing I have the skills and knowledge to help all learners and that I have culturally responsive pedagogy. Watching Russell Bishop speak (Edtalks, 2012) I can attest that Culturally responsive pedagogy is the premise to my practice, for all students within my classroom, and that I am continually evolving and developing my practice in this direction. It is interesting that the six steps he discusses are also the pedagogy for future focused learning, so truly what works for Maori, works for all.
Reflecting
on how my school does within this model, I think they do vision, mission, and core values fairly well. The intention is
there to build relationships with and among students. We have also been
participating in Culture Counts workshops for professional development that are
based upon Russell Bishop’s work. There are attempts to have unity across the
staff based on the theory and values presented within these workshops.
My school could improve the learning activities schoolwide to be
more in alignment with culturally responsive pedagogy. There have been attempts
to have a kaupapa Maori class, but this has now been disbanded. I believe for
this to have been a success other areas needed to be addressed, such as
communication, decision making and more transparency around the goals and
intention behind the set up of this classroom.
The result of this initiation
was an ‘us verse them’ culture that grew out of this. The students involved in
this kaupapa seemed unruly and disrespectful to the staff, other students and
showed disregard toward the school rules and system in place. This could have
been based on the community we are situated within, but a pack mentality seemed
to flourish. Perhaps the outcome would have been different if communications and expectations around this were shared school wide.
In my observation and understanding, embedding culturally
responsive pedagogy within every classroom will have beneficial results for
every student, without the need for segregation, and more toward unity.
Step 2 (So what): Evaluate
your practice or your school practice in light of the following frameworks or
use another one that you are familiar with.
Reflecting on which evaluation framework our school uses,
clearly to me is Milne’s Action Continuum – Eliminating white spaces model. Although
leadership are initiating change within the school, understanding the need for
culturally responsive practice, our policies and assessment practice are
situated within the blue and purple boxes of benevolence with some community
consultation.
Fundamentally, to move along this framework, there are many
changes that would need to happen within our school. I believe the same issues
underscore attempts to make change; lack of trust and communication with staff
to hear teacher voice and share in decision making, lack of support to
implement change in practice, despite being in alignment with future focused
pedagogy and the parallels to culturally responsive practice. How can we model
what this looks like for our students if we cannot model it from leadership to
classroom teachers?
To move from culturally
responsive practice to culturally sustainable practice will take time in our
school community. We have a societal split in the community our students come
from. There are still attitudes from white families that are anti any form of
cultural activity, such as our upcoming noho marae. The ignorance around what
this school experience is means some parents think they have a right to deny
their child this cultural experience based on what I can only term as cultural racism. As long as
these attitudes prevail in our community, we will continue to have whitestream
thinking.
Step 3 (What next) What
might you or your school needs to consider or take actions to move up to the
next level of culturally responsiveness? What are the next steps?
I
believe that attempts are being made to move our school into cultural
responsiveness. Professional development is underway schoolwide, and will
continue to be implemented. It is a process that takes time, time to change
mindsets and attitudes, and to eliminate the pervasive ignorance that only
continues to support the educational gap and negative hegemony that is a result
of being a colonized nation.
Future
focused learning marries well with culturally responsive practices, and as the
educational wheel turns further in this direction it can only but support the
changes necessary as eventually this will become a norm.
Within
our school, supporting and developing agentic teachers will mean they can
become leaders and model what this looks like within classrooms. Our
school would benefit from applying knowledge that teachers bring into the
school, and letting go of control and trust that ultimately these teachers have
the wellbeing of students, colleagues and the representation of a healthy
culturally responsive model for the entire community at the forefront of their
initiatives.
REFERENCES:
CORE Education.
(2017, 17 October). Dr Ann Milne, Colouring in the white spaces:
Reclaiming cultural identity in whitestream schools. [video file].
Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cTvi5qxqp4&feature=em-subs_digest
Edtalks.(2012,
September 23). A culturally responsive pedagogy of relations. [video
file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/49992994
Gay,G.
(2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of
Teacher Education, 53(2),106-116.
Thanks for sharing. I too like you, believe that schools tend to have the human resources that could help in the area of Culturally responsive practises. I found it difficult coming from a school that provided the PD for being Culturally responsive and using Tataiako, to a school that has a high percentage of maori but yet is still in the developing stages of utilising these. Even thou the school is in developing stages, their are some aspects of Culturally responsive within the school but i feel at times we need too ensure we are not being tokenistic while developing these process.
ReplyDeleteKia ora Cassandra, I have only ever taught in a school with 80% + Maaori students. Sometimes we can be susceptable to rest on our laurels and must still remember to upskill and continually ask ourselves similiar questions. Ngaa mihi.
ReplyDeleteA great honest reflection, was interesting to read Cassandra. I too believe that developing culturally responsiveness is a process that takes time, time to change mindsets and attitudes of not only the teachers but the students and their whanau's as well. I am also participating in Cultural Counts and interested to see where this takes our school on this journey next!
ReplyDelete